Skip To Content
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Short Sales from a Tax Perspective – Myth vs Truth

Short Sales from a Tax Perspective – Myth vs Truth

Short sales, principal reduction loan modifications, deeds in lieu and foreclosures all present unique tax consequences, and they vary from one person to another. Much of what we are hearing from clients, which they are hearing from others, is either not true or not true for them.

Jo Ann M. Koontz is an attorney and CPA practicing in the areas of real estate, business organizations, and taxation.
Jo Ann M. Koontz is an attorney and CPA practicing in the areas of real estate, business organizations, and taxation.

Here are my Top 10 Myths –and the corresponding truths– in this area. With a few exceptions, the myths stem from a grain of truth. But just like the game of telephone, the fact that it began as truth doesn’t mean what you’re hearing is reliable.

Myth #1 – “I won’t owe any income tax because this is homestead property.”

This myth began with the passage of the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act (“MDFRA”) in December 2007, which does provide some relief to those taxpayers who face debt forgiveness (which would otherwise be taxable) relating to their real estate. There are significant limits on the relief, however. Here are the requirements:

  • The debt applies to a principal residence as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 121. (Principal residence is NOT necessarily homestead property in Florida.)
  • The debt was used to acquire, construct or substantially improve the principal residence (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 163(h)).
  • The amount of the forgiven debt is not included in the taxpayer’s income, but it reduces the taxpayer’s basis in the property. (This will increase the gain on the sale if the property is sold, and that gain is taxable).
  • The amount of the forgiven debt also reduces, dollar for dollar, the amount of gain that can be excluded under other provisions (IRC Section 121).
  • Only the first $2 million of forgiven debt is excluded from income.

A principal residence for IRS purposes is not the same as homestead property under Florida law. A principal residence is property which has been owned and used, during the 5-year period ending on the date of the sale or the debt forgiveness, as the seller’s primary residence for a total of at least 2 years. Often, a seller did not use the property as a principal residence for 2 years or more during the prior 5 years, even if he declared it as homestead property. If it’s not a principal residence under this definition, there is no tax relief under the MDFRA.

The other requirement that is often not met is the use of the debt to acquire, construct or substantially improve the principal residence. Many property owners refinanced to access cash for reasons unrelated to the property: they started a business, paid off a car loan or credit cards, or took a vacation. Any part of the funds used for those purposes remains taxable. However, if the proceeds were used to add a pool, renovate a kitchen or replace the roof, that portion of the debt forgiven will be excluded from taxable income.

Myth #2 – “I’ll have a loss on the property, so I don’t need to worry about tax.”

Capital losses resulting from the sale of the property will not offset the income resulting from the forgiveness of debt. Also, sellers often believe they have a “loss” on their property when in fact they don’t – selling it for less than you owe isn’t the test. If your basis is less than the debt forgiven, you can actually have a gain. This often happens in the short sale situation, due to the reduction of basis (see 1c above).

Myth #3 – “I can use the $500,000 capital gain exclusion to wipe out any taxable income from the short sale.”

The $500,000 exclusion (for married filing joint, $250,000 for single taxpayers) is a capital gain exclusion only. Income from debt forgiveness is ordinary income, not capital gain. This exclusion is only helpful if a capital gain results from the reduction in the basis of the property. But beware, (as mentioned in 1d above) the amount of the forgiven debt which is excluded from taxable income also reduces the amount of gain that can be excluded under this provision, dollar for dollar.

Myth #4 – “I’m in a low tax bracket, so the tax won’t be that much.”

Before the transaction in question, the seller probably was in a low tax bracket. If the debt forgiven is large (and it’s not unusual these days to see amounts of $50,000-$150,000 and higher), this increases the seller’s taxable income by that amount. It’s like getting a big fat paycheck that you never see, and it puts many sellers into higher tax brackets than their historical rates.

Myth #5 – “I have no assets, so I’m insolvent and don’t need to worry about the tax consequences of a short sale.”

This is true as far as it goes: Section 108 of the IRC indeed provides for excluding forgiven debt from income to the extent the seller is insolvent. However, just because a seller is upside down on their property doesn’t mean they’re insolvent for this purpose. The extent of insolvency for IRS purposes is the difference between the outstanding liabilities and fair market value of the assets (this is all assets, including protected assets such as retirement accounts) owned by the Seller on the date of the short sale. It is virtually impossible to reach a conclusion on insolvency for this purpose without a detailed analysis of all of the seller’s assets and liabilities, including those unrelated to the property, as well as the basis reduction that would occur in the short sale.

The good news on this one is that, unlike the MDFRA, the insolvency exclusion applies to investors. This is an important aspect to explore for them particularly.

Myth #6 – “I heard that the IRS isn’t going after people due to the economic climate.”

Ok, this one doesn’t stem from a grain of truth; it’s just wishful thinking. The IRS is actually increasingits enforcement and collection efforts in the current economic climate. It’s primary purpose is to collect revenue; and the government needs revenue as much as anyone else these days.

Myth #7 – “I’ll just tell the lender that I don’t want a 1099.”

Good luck with that. The 1099-C requirement is not negotiable: it’s the law. If the debt is forgiven, the tax liability has been generated. The lender must report it, and so must the property owner (even if they don’t receive a 1099-C by January 31 of the year following the short sale). Sellers can be subject to a 25% reporting penalty if they don’t report the debt forgiveness; this is not one to be taken lightly.

Myth #8- “I heard on the news that there is no tax on short sales any more.”

See Myth #1. And stop watching the news.

Myth #9 – “I’ll just let the property go into foreclosure, rather than do a short sale, to avoid the taxes.”

This wouldn’t necessarily help you. The tax is the same regardless of how the debt forgiveness comes about: a short sale, principal reduction loan modification, deed in lieu of foreclosure or foreclosure all have the same effect. The only potential difference is the amount of the debt forgiven. For example, default interest, attorney’s fees and costs continue to add up during a foreclosure, which might be avoided or reduced in a short sale, typically making the unpaid balance of the loan (and resulting debt forgiveness) in a foreclosure higher than if a short sale were completed.

Myth #10 – “If I end up owing tax, I’ll just file bankruptcy.”


Koontz & Associates PL is located in Sarasota, FL and assists clients in legal matters relating to Residential and Commercial Real Estate, Business Law, and Tax Law.

1613 Fruitville Road, Sarasota, FL 34236
Phone: 941-225-2615
121 E. Morse Blvd, Winter Park, FL 32789
Phone: 407-704-6974

Source: Short Sales from a Tax Perspective - Myth vs Truth

Trackback from your site.

DeAnna Greenhaw

DeAnna is a Licensed Real Estate Agent and Oliver McConnell's new customer manager at our Sarasota Office. (941) 359-6529.

Leave a Reply